May 7, 2012
panlight:

Vigilante - Official Illustrated Guide, pg 100

Further info, via SM and the Lex:Another Edward point: Edward was never trying to be a superhero—some darker version of the dark knight. That was not his purpose. He was rationalizing, pure and simple. Edward was tired of being in pain, but no so far gone that he would hunt innocents. Back to the burning hand metaphor—he was determined to quench the fire, but for his conscience’s sake, he was going to be particular about which bucket of ice water he used. He was not so much of a vampire after being “raised” by Carlisle that he could be cavalier about it. But he doesn’t share Carlisle’s faith to think he’s got anything to lose in the process. Hopelessness + pain = compromise. A note on Edward’s victims: we’re not talking about some guy who killed his wife ten years ago and has a guilty conscience. We’re talking about serial killers and serial rapists. He always hunted the hunters. As he says in the first chapter of Midnight Sun: “My victims were, in their various dark pastimes, barely more human than I was.” He didn’t look for the guilty post-act, he searched for other hunters pre-act. So he did save a lot of lives during his rebellious years.

Except… Esme’s ex-husband was very much a post-act killing.  He went out and hunted him down.  He didn’t stumble across him and hear his thoughts and realize “oh, he’s going to hurt someone else.”  No, according to the guide, he tracked him down with the intention of killing him.   Some see this as a ‘sweet’ gesture to Esme; I beg to differ. Esme left Charles in 1920, and Edward didn’t leave Carlisle until 1927.  Carlisle and Esme had plenty of time to kill Charles themselves (like Rosalie did with her attackers) if they wanted him dead—the fact that he was still alive in 1927 makes it pretty clear to me Carlisle and Esme weren’t after revenge.

Very interesting! Excellent… 

panlight:

Vigilante - Official Illustrated Guide, pg 100



Further info, via SM and the Lex:

Another Edward point: Edward was never trying to be a superhero—some darker version of the dark knight. That was not his purpose. He was rationalizing, pure and simple. Edward was tired of being in pain, but no so far gone that he would hunt innocents. Back to the burning hand metaphor—he was determined to quench the fire, but for his conscience’s sake, he was going to be particular about which bucket of ice water he used. He was not so much of a vampire after being “raised” by Carlisle that he could be cavalier about it. But he doesn’t share Carlisle’s faith to think he’s got anything to lose in the process. Hopelessness + pain = compromise.

A note on Edward’s victims: we’re not talking about some guy who killed his wife ten years ago and has a guilty conscience. We’re talking about serial killers and serial rapists. He always hunted the hunters. As he says in the first chapter of Midnight Sun: “My victims were, in their various dark pastimes, barely more human than I was.” He didn’t look for the guilty post-act, he searched for other hunters pre-act. So he did save a lot of lives during his rebellious years.



Except… Esme’s ex-husband was very much a post-act killing.  He went out and hunted him down.  He didn’t stumble across him and hear his thoughts and realize “oh, he’s going to hurt someone else.”  No, according to the guide, he tracked him down with the intention of killing him.   Some see this as a ‘sweet’ gesture to Esme; I beg to differ.

Esme left Charles in 1920, and Edward didn’t leave Carlisle until 1927.  Carlisle and Esme had plenty of time to kill Charles themselves (like Rosalie did with her attackers) if they wanted him dead—the fact that he was still alive in 1927 makes it pretty clear to me Carlisle and Esme weren’t after revenge.

Very interesting! Excellent… 

  1. cristxnbxsvxv reblogged this from facinelli-rdj
  2. squeakyzorro reblogged this from ohmycarlisle and added:
    I didn’t see Edward killing Charles as a “sweet” gesture at all. It was anger and revenge—to some extent for what...
  3. fionarhiannon reblogged this from ohmycarlisle
  4. facinelli-rdj reblogged this from ohmycarlisle
  5. save-the-sourwolf reblogged this from ohmycarlisle
  6. scottishrose1028 reblogged this from ohmycarlisle
  7. ohmycarlisle reblogged this from panlight and added:
    In The Esme Chronicles, Charles is not Edward’s first victim. Here’s some insights from others about the situation.
  8. oksanaareginaa reblogged this from melbietoast
  9. judyblue95 reblogged this from melbietoast
  10. now-im-all-yours reblogged this from ahsfans
  11. luvyarob reblogged this from melbietoast
  12. jolepattz reblogged this from melbietoast
  13. melissaann2you reblogged this from melbietoast
  14. dontforgetkassandra reblogged this from ahsfans
  15. saraiave reblogged this from ahsfans
  16. unorthodoxlarry reblogged this from ahsfans and added:
    BUT HE STILL SAVED OTHER LIVES!
  17. wishing-for-rain reblogged this from ahsfans
  18. ahsfans reblogged this from melbietoast
  19. melbietoast reblogged this from panlight and added:
    Very interesting! Excellent…
  20. carnelianheart reblogged this from iluvmormonvampires and added:
    Yes! This! It’s always been hard for me to articulate but that’s exactly how I see it, too. He doesn’t care about the...
  21. iluvmormonvampires reblogged this from panlight and added:
    I don’t think Edward is a “good guy” at all. We see that in ‘Midnight Sun’ when he’s fantasizing about killing Bella and...
  22. cristina-chris reblogged this from panlight
  23. panlight posted this
Blog comments powered by Disqus